|
||
|
| ||
|
Sri Hari
GURUJI SRI MURALIDHARA SWAMIGAL MISSION |
||
|
SWAMIGAL SPEAKS |
MISSION |
NÃMA BHIKSHA KENDRA |
VEDA PATASHALA |
PUBLICATIONS/PERIODICALS |
|
||
|
Premika Bhavanam, Chennai
Page 1 Page 2
Sri Swamigal has been rendering ‘Upanyãs’ (discourses), in Tamizh, in Premika Bhavanam. This is being brought to you here. There may appear to be variations in the ‘tense’ of the language. This is due to the fact that great effort has been taken to maintain the original style of the ‘Upanyãs’. Therefore, we request you to keep this in mind while reading the translated ‘words’ of Sri Swamigal.
Sri Swamigal, " Next song is
‘Katrruk karavaik kanangal palakarandhu
Click here for Thiruppãvai (11) in Tamil
‘Katrruk karavaik kanangal palakarandhu’ - All are young calves. But they are milking well! How can calves give milk? Here the Swami says, ‘ All of them are cows and not calves. Due to Krishna’s touch they have remained young! And so they appear to be calves!’ He has touched them. Krishna’s touch has kept them young! When Swami speaks about it his mind roams around all similar episodes. This is how a Mahãtma’s heart is. He recalls the episode in Ramayana wherein Dasaratha explains to Kaikeyi (Dasaratha’s wife) why Rama should not be sent to the forest but be retained in the palace. ‘A wife desires her husband to be young looking. When Rama comes in to see me my heart blooms seeing his beauty and charm and as he walks out then, too, I enjoy his beauty and this joy reduces my age considerably and I look young! So, Kaikeyi! Would you not be happy to see me young? So, it is only right to retain him here in Ayodhya!’ ‘So, if Dasaratha could turn young seeing Rama can’t the cows remain young with the touch of Krishna?’ questions the Swamy.
Vrindãvan was filled with cows. It had a very big herd. Even Krishna does not know how many cows there were in there. The term ‘Gokulam’ refers to the place where the herds are taken care of. Though in the broad sense Gokulam refers to Vrindãvan, it was in reality a place reserved in every kingdom for the upkeep of the herds. The cowherds lived in Gokulam taking care of the herds. They had their own leader. Like ‘agraharam’ in a village, where the Brahmins lived. A Siva temple at one end and a Vishnu temple at the other with houses in between is called an ‘agrahãram’. This is the sort of atmosphere that prevailed in villages. It is with the temple that a village/town is judged. Mahãtmas have divine vision (‘divya drishti’) and when they visit a place they are able to recognise the particular God whose ‘sãnnidhya’ (presence) prevails there. And they also know the past, present and the future of that place. A Mahãtma realized the Presence of Lord Vishnu in a place. In his ‘dhyãna’ (meditation) he saw ‘Uppiliyappan’ marry ‘Bhoomi’ thãyãr. The Mahãtma saw ‘Bhoomi Pirãtti’(consort of Lord Uppiliyappan) and (her father) Mãrkandeya Maharashi. So, Uppiliyappan temple was established here for the ordinary people to enjoy. Here, the people enjoy the Lord in ‘arcchãvatãr’. Four streets run around the temple and there are twelve ‘cherigal’ (dwellings). ‘Agrahãram’ is only a general term. Similarly, Gokulam is a general term. The place was usually a fertile land on the banks of a river, with a mountain nearby so as to facilitate grazing. Such places were called ‘Gokulam’. Yadavas lived there. All kingdoms had a Gokulam. Even in Mahabharata, ‘Virãda parvã’ contains a description of Arjuna’s life in hiding in a Gokulam. It was at this time that Bhishma and Dronachãriya wage a war against the Prince of this Gokulam. There were innumerable cows in the Gokulams with a local prince. So, here, too, in this Gokulam of Krishna there is a big herd of cows. And these cows that seem like calves give milk. And the milk is offered to Bhagavãn. I narrated the incident in ‘Koorathãzhwãr’s’ life when he throws away all his wealth and proceeds to Kancheepuram saddened that Goddess Mahalakshmi referred to his wealth than his devotion to his Lord and Guru Sri Ramanuja. Koorathãzhwãr calls his wife, “We will not hold these properties anymore. It is this wealth of mine that seems to be bigger than my devotion to my Ãcchhãrya. So, let us throw it all away and go to my Guru.” His wife’s name was Ãndãl. Throwing away his wealth, Koorathãzhwãr first goes to Kanchi and then to Sri Rangam. While travelling by foot, Koorathãzhwãr finds his wife holding on to something. He questions her and finds out that it is a golden measure! He snatches it from her and throws it away! They both then proceed to Sri Rangam and take ‘Unchavriti’ (beg for food) there. He is in dire poverty but the physical closeness of the ‘Ãcchãrya’ (Guru) and his affection keeps him very happy. Nothing else matters to him. The couple is childless and the wife yearns for a child. So she requests the husband to seek his Guru’s blessings to this end. But he scoffs at her, “My Guru is a ‘kalpaka vriksha’ (the divine tree of bounty) and if I ask Him for this kind of a blessing it is akin to seeking a loin cloth from him! So, I will not seek such a blessing from Him”. One day the couple went without food, as there was not a single grain at home. At night, when the wife was massaging his feet she heard the loud sound of the Temple Bell announcing the ‘aravanai pãyasam sevai’ - Offering of sweetened milk pudding to Lord Ranganatha. They were poverty stricken but Koorathãzhwãr did not mind about this state. He was totally indifferent to it. On hearing the Temple bell, the grief-stricken wife thought, “My husband is lying here without food. But Bhagavãn is having ‘pãyasam’! Is this justified?” There in the Temple Bhagavãn, through one of the priests, instructed that the Pãyasam be taken to Koorathãzhwãr. The latter was surprised on receiving it and when Ãndãl confessed the thoughts that had crossed her mind, he was very angry with her. “Is this not an insult to Bhagavãn? You may take this. I will not have this ‘pãyasam’.” She drank the ‘pãyasam’ and subsequently gave birth to two sons. One was called Parãsara Bhattar and the other Veda Vyasa Bhattar. Parãsara Bhattar entertained a child’s attitude towards Bhagavãn. That He (the Lord) was his mother and father. At this time there was a big scholar called ‘sãrva bhowma’. He challenged Sri Ramanuja for a debate. Parãsara Bhattar who was only five years of age then, did not like Sri Ramanuja being challenged. So the child went up to this scholar and called him for a debate. The proud scholar agreed and gave the child the benefit of posing the question first. The child held a handful of sand and asked him, “Please, tell me how much sand is being held in my hand?” The scholar could not reply and the child said, “A handful!” The defeated scholar felt ashamed and quit the place.
‘Chenru cherrucheyyum’ - the Yadava prince goes for wars. So he has a lance (‘vel’) in his hand - ‘Nin Kaiyil vel potrri.’
Why is Krishna holding a lance? To protect the cows from the wild animals.
And also to protect His people from other enemies. So, Bhagavãn, at first, as a child killed those enemies who came to Him but later he searched out for them and killed them. He is powerful (‘parãkramasãli’).
"GOPIKÃ JEEVANASMARANAM Page 1 Page 2
NOTE: Any discrepancy/lapse in the translated version of the Upanyasam is the sole responsibility of the person/s who translated the work from Tamizh into English.
Radhe Krishna |
|||||