Swamigal Speaks . . .

Questions

  1. I intend writing a commentary on the 'Bhagavad Gita'. Could I please have your opinion on this?

  2. Why so?

  3. Is it necessary to have a 'japamala' while doing japa?

  4. In spite of deep sadhana there does not seem to be any spiritual progress. Why so?

  5. I am unable to read epics such as the Bhagavatham and Ramayana. Morover, I am old. What am I to do?

  6. Is it right for the Mahatmas to give importance to dignitaries when they visit them?

  7. Is 'spirituality' just a means of escape?


I intend writing a commentary on the 'Bhagavad Gita'. Could I please have your opinion on this?

A commentary for the Bhagavad Gita, Bhagavatham, Ramayana, the Veda, or for any work of a Mahatma (Saints/great soul) should be written only by Mahatmas for if done by others it will turn out to be a mere intellectual/scholastic exercise.
Back to the top


Why so?

The use of a tree is the shadow it provides, the flowers and fruits it bears. If, instead of just accepting and benefiting by these we were to research into it by digging its roots, it would endanger the very existence of the tree. Likewise, when one tends to read a Mahatma's work superfluously the real essence of it might be misconstrued and may even appear to be against the existing social norms. So, you will only be confused if you perceive it with your critical mind. If these great works are read after 'realisation' you will be able to appreciate the inner meanings.
Back to the top


Is it necessary to have a 'japamala' while doing japa?

Not necessarily. Yet, if you do use one, others will keep away from you as it will be openly seen that you are doing japa. That way it is indeed useful.
Back to the top


In spite of deep sadhana there does not seem to be any spiritual progress. Why so?

You might have only recently developed the yearning to realize God and this might be due to your having read many spiritual books or having attended many spiritual lectures. However, you might still be nurturing worldly desires within. And these two are contradictory. This must have given rise to confusion or led to the turbulence of the mind. The whole mind set on this one goal, a deep yearning to reach it and a sadhana done without any lax on your part - only these will help you attain the goal. You may disagree with what I have said. But, the very fact of your experiencing grief when you are faced with sorrows and disappointments in your life is proof enough for these. One with deep spiritual thirst should not attach importance to any worldly loss or gain.
Back to the top


I am unable to read epics such as the Bhagavatham and Ramayana. Morover, I am old. What am I to do?

Epics such as the Bhagavatham, Ramayana, contain the divine play and the experiences of those who were with the Lord when He incarnated on this earth. If, in your life, you have had any connection with a Mahatma or an Avatara purusha (an Incarnation) it will suffice if you can recall from your memory the time you have spent with Him. This being a direct experience there will be immense pleasure and joy in it. This in itself is Bhagavatham, Ramayana, etc. as far as you are concerned.
Back to the top


Is it right for the Mahatmas to give importance to dignitaries when they visit them?

A Mahatma gave special attention to a dignitary who visited him. One of his disciples placed the same question before his Guru. His Guru explained, "One who comes to me seeking wealth I bless him with wealth, one seeking health with health and one seeking liberation with liberation. As they seek so I bless. This particular person sought special attention and respect from me and so I gave that to him.
Back to the top


Is 'spirituality' just a means of escape?

Unless one has a direct experience of spirituality it will only appear to be so. Without 'realisation' confusions and doubts will not cease to be. Or one should have strong belief in Mahatmas' words. So long as one is self-centred nothing can be comprehended.
Back to the top